Some brilliant individual once stated that “United we stand, but divided we fall.”
(Aesop originally said in in one of his fables, but Patrick Henry was the
person most Americans attribute it to, but that’s not the point.)
In the original woodcut that the now-famous Gadsden (Don’t Tread on Me) Flag
borrowed from, Benjamin Franklin depicted a snake severed into several parts,
Franklin was trying to tell the people that they had to put aside their individuality
and form together as a WHOLE, with the diverse issues of the people of the
individual colonies secondary to the issue that was most important…
FREEDOM.
And yet everywhere we look nowadays, some special-interest group is out screaming for its recognition as an individual, separate part, rather than becoming a part of the whole. The whole, in this case, being our country...
The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Diversity is NOT always a good thing. Not back in Franklin’s time, and most assuredly, NOT in our world today. In order to face the future, a future full of uncertainty, we MUST join together. We must put aside individual differences. We must be ONE. We must become that which our Founding Fathers envisioned. We must, as the woodcut stated, 'Join or Die'.
Diversity has gone too far, and has created a chasm within our country among average AMERICAN citizens. Why must we draw attention to pointless, superficial differences, when we are all, first and foremost, AMERICANS?
Why, rather than calling ourselves African , Hispanic, Asian, or European, thus drawing attention to our differences, can we not simply take pride in being called
AMERICANS?
When people chose to come to this country, for whatever reason, should they not
embrace their new homeland and celebrate it, rather than attempting to turn it
into a colony of the country they left? And did they leave their former country because they were happy there?
“Divide and Conquer.” Ever heard that? That was said by Julius Caesar as he prepared to cross the Rubicon and enter Rome, changing it from a Republic into an Empire.
Caesar divided the people from the Senate on issues and ended up conquering
Rome in mere days.
But that could never happen here, right?
Are you sure it hasn’t already?
At the time of this writing, Americans, ALL Americans, are more heavily split over
socio-economic issues than at any time in our county’s history, and many of the
edumacated, degree-laden, pontificators of pointless theorems continue to exacerbate the problem, by insisting that we must “Envelope our individual and cultural diversities and cling to them, remaining true to our native heritage, and never allow ourselves to become indoctrinated into the masses and losing our grip on our true culture.”
What a crock!
I’m not going the belabor the issues of unfair hiring practices and quotas in this
blog, nor am I going to call attention to the purposeful incitement of racial
tensions, many brought about by some of the well-known civil rights groups (the
ACLU being the biggest inciter of these) in our country.
I’m also not going to share my disgust over the foreign flags flying over people’s
homes or businesses, or the language barriers that have resulted by those that
refuse to learn to communicate with fellow Americans.
And I'm certainly NOT going to go off on illegal immigrants.
Rather, I’m going to tell you a story…
There once was a cook, a great cook, who was about to share his latest creation with the rest of the world. A stew. A stew unlike any other ever before, one that
combined exotic ingredients from all over the world.
He set about preparing his stew, but a man that liked salt came to him and said
“You need more salt. The salt brings out flavors.”
So, wanting to please the man, he added more salt.
“You need more pepper,” Another told him, one that liked pepper, so, again, wanting to please the man, he added more pepper.
“More celery,” one said. “More meat,” said another. “No, the basil overwhelms the thyme, add more.” And so it went, on and on, the cook making certain that each ingredient stood out.
The time came to present the stew before all the world, and people lined up to taste this fabulous creation…
And each of them spat the stew out of their mouths onto the ground, saying that it was “Too salty,” or “Too much pepper,” or even “Not enough basil.”
The cook’s reputation was ruined, so he went home , vowing to never again cook. His wife left him, the bank foreclosed on his home, and he ended up on the street, and in a drunken stupor, was run over by a garbage truck.
Do you get it yet? If so, let me know.
If you disagree with my observations, well, that’s your right, as an AMERICAN.
Since the Democrat Party lost the likes of 'Scoop' Jackson, left behind the likes of Joe Lieberman, and was bought up by the likes of "we bought it, we own it" MoveOn [ http://bit.ly/TglPuI ] it is not invested in America or the Declaration or anything like these. Instead it is wholly interested in harvesting votes from the virtual plantation of benighted thralls it does everything in its power to maintain. To believe "one flag, one Declaration, one nation under God" is to be an anathema to the Democrat Party as we know it today.
Mr. Thayer, sir, your comment struck a chord with me. "Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed..." I guess they've forgotten that. Shame too. I've tasted that 'stew' and found it revolting. It's truly time to wake up and realize that, like Red Green says, "We're all in this TOGETHER."
Sorry, I don't buy it. Diversity is, and always has been, at the heart of what makes this country both great and strong. A false, arbitrarily defined "unity" - which often seems to boil down to "my way or the highway" - is the mark of groups and movements I'm sure the author would be highly offended to be compared with.
In Feb of last year, British PM David Cameron, in his FIRST speech as PM, stated that Multiculturalism has failed and was threatening the very safety and existence of England: "We have failed to provide a vision of society to which they feel they want to belong. We have even tolerated these segregated communities behaving in ways that run counter to our values. Building a stronger sense of national and local identity holds "the key to achieving true cohesion" by allowing people to say "I am a Muslim, I am a Hindu, I am a Christian, but I am a Londoner... too", he said. This is NOT and attack, anyone who reads it w/ unbiased eyes can see this fact. To compare this with the KKK is insulting at best. We are not getting stronger; another simple unbiased observation. In my 47 years, I have NEVER seen this country so divided, frustrated, angry, apathetic and dysfunctional. I was born during the civil right movement, the Vietnam War and lived with the cold war, under threat of MAD every day...but I have never, ever seen this country so divided in so many ways and such a vacuum of leadership at the national level. I am not even sure if it possible to lead such a divided country...is it? This was a great article, yet so simple: Observing empirical evidence is easy, stating it has become increasingly difficult. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12371994
History repeats ... “This country belongs to the people who inhabit it. Its resources, its business, its institutions and its laws should be utilized, maintained or altered in whatever manner will best promote the general interest. Political parties exist to secure responsible government and to execute the will of the people. From these great tasks both of the old parties have turned aside. Instead of instruments to promote the general welfare they have become the tools of corrupt interests, which use them impartially to serve their selfish purposes. Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to dissolve the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics, is the first task of the statesmanship of the day." ~ Teddy Roosevelt 1912 “Politics - noun. A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage. “There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.” ― Warren Buffett, New York Times, November 26, 2006”
Yep, the crooked politicians and banksters have recreated a new debt servitude/feudal system, they own everything and they'll make all the rules. Just wait another 9 months or less when the dollar collapses and is replaced with the IMF's new SDR (Special Drawing Rights) currency and the new UN taxes kick in... yes, they are all ready to be rolled out, they are just waiting for the right time...
Who's to say what is "diverse" or not? Who measures it? Who determines these things and for what reasons? Is diversity about color, ethnicity, religion, intelligence, ability, hair color, weight, occupation, beliefs or what? No one should care about diversity one way or another. Those who are not diverse (for diversity to exist sameness must also exist in order to identify what is diverse and what is not diverse, right? ) are not better, worse or even the same than each other. If someone is different from you, it's the same, they are neither better, worse or the same as you. To say any other person is not diverse, whether they have the same skin color, ethnicity, religion as you is to be ignorant and as racist as any Klan member who says someone is different based on these very same things. Think about what you are saying. If it goes one way, then it also travels in reverse. To embrace "diversity" is really the equivalent to embracing "sameness." If it's good for one, then why not the other way? How about embracing individuals for being individuals, not the same, not different, for their own merits period, whatever they might be or not be.
Well said.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/29880401?__source=yahoo%7Cusgovtdebt%7C&par=yahoo
Power in numbers. They need us more than we need them. You're only a debt slave if you choose to be one. Most people put themselves in shackles, so now they have to break free. I realize it's not going to be easy. But, what is? My husband and I are totally debt free and have been for decades. We've always lived "below are means" and saved, saved, and saved. We enjoy the company of our family and friends. We share in good times, lots of laughs, good food and your choice of libation (in moderation of course). What more is there? People need to realize that the "Stuff" isn't important. We do have some say in this. We just say "No".
Who owns your home until they get that last nickel of your mortgage? Well, they own only the portion for which you still owe them for. Any accrued equity is yours, provided you have any. Any if you don't have any equity, well then I'd say you're in over your head. You should have rented. Buying a home is a Huge responsibilty. One that many shouldn't take on. If you don't have at least a 20% downpayment, then you shouldn't buy. Sure, the debt master will tell you differently. For they want you to be a debt slave. That's how they make their money. Those that owned their homes for years and then used them as ATM's and burden themselves with new mortage debt can only blame themselves. No one but themselves. They are the ones that have to "honker down" the most. Homeownership isn't for everyone, and should'nt be. Nothing wrong with renting. Actually in today's economy, if you're younger, you're better off renting for you're more mobile. Leaves you open to more job opportunties in other parts of the country and world
it was synonymous to the land ownership enjoyed by those past monarchy's who owned and controlled the majority (all?) of a defined country's natural assets. (or other wise a scattered, constantly defended, bunch of changing smaller territories within a single land mass) feudal obeisance to the king/queen meant virtual servitude, non-ownership of shelter and land, endless work to offer up payments/taxes to be allowed to exist on that land and complete abandonment of personal will or self decision. (in other words, be a total brown nosing suck up or you are 'outed') you were either 'with' the king or against the king/queen. consequences were final and usually fatal. (cold thump of head hitting the ground here) Fed will declare themselves (ahem) bankrupt and leave the taxpayer with perhaps 1 percent of their net worth. the Fed will seemingly 'vanish', and re-emerge as some other 'new' cockamamie named entity. (standard means of many scam artists, fraud perpetrators and so forth) bingo, instant inflation of 1000 percent, and the only ones left able to 'pay' for anything are those few (relatively speaking) who have amassed billions of the 'old money' from the prior system. (almost close to what we have now)