Lawyer: Assault Didn't Happen
The Journal Inquirer is reporting that the attorney representing Brian Francolini says a sexual assault didn't happen on Saturday.
The attorney representing Brian Francolini says the sexual assault Francolini is charged with didn't happen, according to the Journal Inquirer.
The paper quotes Wayne R. Keeney as saying in part, "When we peel away the exaggerated indignation of these people who have their own agenda, we will find that no crime occurred here, not even an impropriety has occurred. What we will find is two young people experimenting with life, and nothing more."
The CT Post originally reported that Francolini, 20, from Ellington, and Justin Brewer, 22, from Somers, had been charged with assaulting a 19-year-old woman at their off-campus apartment on Saturday. Both attend Sacred Heart University and played on the school's soccer team.
According to the Journal Inquirer, both men will appear in Bridgeport Superior Court on Feb. 16.
Ben Streib
10:43 am on Friday, February 3, 2012
Ellington parent connection isnt a job get on with ur life. No one cares what you have to say....
Erin Quinlan
11:12 am on Friday, February 3, 2012
Please remember the terms of use when commenting and stick to the topic at hand. Thank you.
-Erin
Nice Try Debby
12:17 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Alright Debbie, you know none of the facts of the night, so keep your date rape comments to yourself. And i agree with your last statement, because it is unfair to the girls who have to go thru that, but this is not one of the cases. What they never show you in the news is the girls who abuse the "date rape" claim, with false accusations. How come these girls dont get the headline of " Girls destroy two boys reputation with lies"? I bet you never thought of that side, did you? These two kids are 100% innocent, and have been thru hell, because of stupid comments like yours. So how about you think, before you post something you know nothing about. AND IM OUT!!! PEACE SON!!!!!!! KEEP IT SLEEZY!!!!
Nice Try Debby
12:45 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
I am happy that Erin is doing her best to post the other side, and save these boys reputation. I thank you for that :)
Erin Quinlan
12:53 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
While I appreciate the kind words, I'm not trying to save reputations, just trying to post all the facts and updates on the story - whatever the truth and outcome of the case may be. -Erin
Nice Try Debby
1:08 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Yes, your right "save" wasn't the right choice in words. The facts will be helpful enough to rebuild their reputation alone.
This is America?
2:04 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
I thought that it was " innocent until proven guilty", not guilty when accused or charged! Because if the latter statement is correct then I find the person who made the first post to be guilty of bias, ignorance and stupidity! Maybe some people should " Rise Above" making pre-judgmental statements about this situation until all the facts are out and have been heard!
Nice Try Debby
3:46 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
hahahaha awesome
Debbie Stauffer
2:49 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
My comment was specifically about a generalized statement a lawyer said about what happens innocently on college campuses weekend after weekend year after year. I wasn't even talking about the people charged with the assault. It was the lawyer's quote. I could have hidden behind an anonymous name too.
Nice Try Debby
3:51 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
my name is tyler cleverdon (NOT HIDING BEHIND AN ANONYMOUS NAME), and if u weren't talking about the people accused with the assault, the take your comments somewhere else. Because no one here wants to hear them. Your only instigating the problem by your comments in the first place. TAKE IT SLEEZY, AND IM OUT!!!
Anonymous 1
3:10 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
What is so bad about what is happening “innocently on college campuses weekend after weekend and year after year”? Yes, there are the undoubtedly tragic cases of students being sexually assaulted, but this is by no means the norm, and these definitely are not the innocent activities that the lawyer was referring to. Like the lawyer said, this is a case of “two young people experimenting with life, and nothing more”. Two young people experimenting in college certainly is not a crime, and it most definitely is not “date rape”. Let’s hope that justice is brought to the two young men wrongfully accused.
Debbie Stauffer
4:10 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Thanks Tyler for identifying yourself. I will remove my comments.
This is America?
6:17 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Kudos to Mr. Cleverdon for getting Ms. Stauffer to remove her irresponsible comments! I find it funny that she said that her only motivation was to comment on statements from a lawyer. It seems that her interpretation of the lawyers comments was that date rapes occur numerous times on college campus' and that is the norm. When if she would have just got off her high horse, she might have realized that just maybe this lawyer was trying to say that consensual sex and sex acts occur between college students numerous times every day, of every year and that he is going to prove that this is what happened with his client. This is what happens when unrighteous people feel the need to comment on everything they read or hear about. If she felt the need to address the serious issue of date rape then she should have wrote her own article about that topic and not tied it in with this article! I only hope that if and when these young men are found innocent, she will be just as quick to write about how false rape and date rape accusations can be as severely devastating on the accused, as a rape can be on its victim, and the effects it has on them and their families!
Dome
7:16 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Mr. Cleverdon is biased. And so are you. You did not take the time to read the comments made by Mrs. S. She never made a comment that indicted Francolini. Looks to me that the comments were directed at the attorney, who is using typical sleazy lawyer tactics to discredit the female. Mr. Francolini has an observed long history of treating women badly. Looks to me like he finally got caught. Good bye scholarship. Time to go with D2 or D3. Maybe both of them could go play in Europe together. Shameful.
This is America?
8:04 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
No shame on you Dome! I never said that Ms. Stauffers comments were directed at Mr. Francolini! And shame on you for assuming that it was just typical lawyer tactics to discredit the female. I don't claim to know any of the facts in this case. I do however know that if I was ever wrongly accused of a crime, I sure as heck would want a lawyer that believed me and would state so publicly. But the biggest shame is for you to claim that Mr. Cleverdon and I are biased, but it is you who is disparaging Mr. Francolini with out any proof of your accusations!
Anonymous
6:31 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
First of all, this just proves that no good can come from underage drinking, or drinking too much at any age for that matter.
Second of all, this is ridiculous. And by "this," I mean the comments to this article. Anyone is allowed to respond to any article with their opinions, but in responsible ways. Debbie merely stated her opinion and is getting attacked for it. How about you boys be mature and respond in a mature argumentative way instead of acting like teenagers and saying unrelated, hurtful things. How can you say that she has "none of the facts" when she has just the same amount of everyone else and is putting her opinion towards it? And yet, while you are all immaturely attacking her, she's still being the mature one. And how about you take your own advice and think before you judge. In case you didn't notice, Debbie was commenting on what the LAWYER said. The lawyer made it seem like it was no big deal when it really is. The way the lawyer put it was that this is the "norm." Like anyone else who's passionate about what they believe in, Debbie was just standing up to it. She wasn't even talking about the people charged with the assault! So how about you, again, "get your facts right" before wrongly accusing her.
And how come Patch hasn't done anything about this? These comments are inappropriate and oppressive. Clearly the terms of use haven't been remembered.
Oh and Tyler Cleverdon? You ARE hiding behind an anonymous name. Just saying.
Nice Try Debby
8:06 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
hey dome, i might be a little biased, but i guarantee i know way more about the situation than you or anyone else in the thread.
Anonymous
6:39 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
I just find it funny how many disrespectful people are in this town. It just sucks that the people that try to be the change get the most crap for it. I got your back Debbie.
Nice Try Debby
7:12 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Ok Anonymous, I was there the night of the incident, and know the facts of what happened. I also got facts from people who were also there so, before u do the same as debbie, think before you speak. Your doing the same exact thing we are, by commenting on the topic, and calling people out for it, so dont think you are anything special. Look at the name you commented under, I at least said who i was when the topic started getting heated. So why dont you do the same a debbie and leave this page that you know nothing about. I can at least respect the fact the debbie apoligized and took her post down. But you still prying at this just proves my point that people who dont know anything about the topic shouldnt respond. These kids are innocent until proven guilty. So to make comments about date rape, is a little premature. So anonymous, in hindsight you are no better than me or anyone else who commented on this. Please dont call my name out again, bc i am only voicing my opinion on someone who is a good friend of mine, and doesnt deserve your disrespect. So if you would like to email me at ynwa158@gmail.com you are more then welcome to talk about the subject with me, but if not, then keep your opinions to yourself.
Anonymous
8:10 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
A few things. First, compare this post to your previous ones. This one is more mature than your previous ones and that was all I was getting at. We are all free to our own opinions and I respect what everyone has to say. However, I lose my respect when someone is disrespectful to others when voicing their opinions. So this post was more mature and I appreciate that.
As for you sticking up for your friend, that is exactly what I am doing as well. I am sticking up for Debbie just as you are sticking up for your friend.
Also, the point of the comment section is to voice your opinions. So I will not keep my opinions to myself, especially when I see everyone attacking someone who was innocently voicing her opinion. If you are allowed to say what you want, then so is everyone else. It's a two way street. Again, it all comes down to respect and Debbie doesn't deserve YOUR disrespect. ALSO, if you take a look at my previous post, you will notice how I said nothing disrespectful to the accused. You should fully read what people have to say before assuming things yourself.
Anonymous
8:16 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Also, the only reason you mentioned your name was because Debbie said that at least she used her real name. In my opinion, I find that she was very brave to do that. She is real. You, however, made a disrespectful and an anonymous name at first.
So how about you think about both sides of situations and stop accusing people of things they didn't say or mean.
anonymous
7:22 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
This thread is out of control. Stop the personal accusations. This is sad for all involved; the boys the girls, the friends, the families. No young kids should have to go through any of this. Let it be.
Anonymous
7:56 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
i agree completely
This is America?
7:45 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
I find it disrespectful that a few self centered people feel the need to "change" people who have not asked for, don't want or don't need their "change". Ms. Stauffer was not just stating an opinion, she assumed that she knew what the thoughts and intentions of a lawyer was, because of a statement he made to a reporter. Well it is just as irresponsible for Ms. Stauffer to assume that she knew what the lawyers intentions and thoughts were, as it is for you to assume that underage drinking had any play in this matter at all! Unless of course you have blood alcohol test to prove differently! For Ms. Stauffers to assume that by the lawyers statement and how it was portrayed in a news article, she felt he was saying that date rape "happens innocently on college campuses weekend after weekend year after year", is just wrong! She has no right to assume she knew what the lawyers thoughts or intentions were at all! At no point did the lawyer condone rape. Furthermore for you to say that the "lawyer made it seem like it was no big deal" is also wrong! A reporter wrote that article and not the lawyer. So if you want to say that the reporter made it seem like the lawyer felt a certain way, maybe, but here again that would only be the reporters opinion not fact. And here is where FACT is important. The FACTS are what this case will be judged on, not opinions.
Anonymous
8:28 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Debbie was, as a matter of fact, stating an opinion that she had based upon what the lawyer said. She wasn't going off of the article and you would've known that if you really knew what she was saying. Yes, a reporter wrote the article. However, Debbie was stating an opinion on a QUOTE by the lawyer. There is a huge difference between that. And the fact that you think Debbie's opinion is wrong is your OPINION. The fact that you say it is wrong for Debbie to assume something from the lawyer's thoughts is wrong within itself. It was a direct quote that she used to go off of. And THAT is my opinion. How about you get your FACTS right.
This is America?
8:57 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Perhaps it is you that should read more carefully. I never said that Ms. Stauffers opinion was wrong. I simply said that I feel the assumption that she knew what the lawyers thoughts and intentions where from an article she read could be wrong. Only the lawyer knows what his thoughts and intentions were. For me to really know what Ms. Stauffer was saying is for me to read what she posted (and has since removed) and interpret what I feel she meant. But it was her own words that I was interpreting not words or quotes from a reporter.. And yes I and other posters could have misinterpret what she wrote also. But it is WRONG for anyone to say they know for sure what someone meant or felt by what someone has been quoted as saying. I am sure that at some point in your life you have either been miss-quoted and had someone miss-understand the meaning of something you have said. The FACT is neither Ms. Stauffer, you nor I know what that lawyer meant or felt because of his quote!
Anonymous
9:09 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
When someone makes an assumption from a quote, THAT is their opinion. So, yes, you were actually saying that her opinion was wrong. Also, she didn't say that she knew for sure what the lawyer's intentions were at all. She was responding to the quote with. her. opinion. There is HUGE difference in someone knowing and someone forming an opinion. I do agree with you that we can never truly know for sure what the lawyer was thinking, but it's natural for all of us to take the information given to us and respond to it with what we believe. What the lawyer said was very controversial. It's normal for people to take it different ways. Essentially, it all comes back to the wording of the lawyer.
This is America?
9:44 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
The definition of opinion is an estimate, judgment or point of view. While the definition of assume is to take for granted without proof. That is why I did not feel that Ms. Stauffer's opinion was the problem ( she has the right to her point of view). It was her assumption (taking for granted with-out proof) that she could interpret the lawyers feelings from his quote that I feel was wrong. Because by doing that she made it seem in her original post) that she was implying that the lawyer was trying to say that date rape type actions happen and are accepted on colleges all the time. For her to assume (take for granted without proof ) that those were his feelings is wrong. It is also that assumption and her comments about that assumption in her original post that started this whole debate!
This is America?
7:47 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
It is a FACT that rape and date rape are big problems! But it is also a FACT that innocent people are accused of crimes all the time! It is also a FACT that these young men have a right to their statements, just like you and I have the right to ours (freedom of speech). But the most important FACT of all is that, only two people know the true FACTS of what happened and hopefully the truth will prevail in the end!
Anonymous
8:29 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
This, I agree with.
Megan Bard
7:55 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Please familiarize yourself with the Patch Terms of Use before you comment on this site: http://ellington-somers.patch.com/terms.
You are not allowed to post a comment that convicts the two men charged or the woman who has accused them of assault. You are also not allowed personally attack the other people posting here. If you do your comments will be removed and your account could be suspended.
If you have any questions or concerns about the Patch policy, please contact me at megan.bard@patch.com.
Megan
anonymous
9:18 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
There are an awful lot of "personal attacks", Megan. Please consider removing the comments. They are hurtful and certainly do not help the case in any way nor do they really reflect on the article. Out of control.
Megan Bard
10:10 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
OK, this has gone around and around long enough. Either move the conversation forward or I'm going to shut down the comment thread. Thanks.
Megan